https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53986
--- Comment #14 from Nemo <[email protected]> --- Thanks for the reply. (In reply to comment #12) > [...] I simply don't want to move stuff twice, but I am also aware > that in history, "trying to do it right" often ends up in doing nothing. The three products mentioned above are quite small (or minuscule even) and won't be a problem in this respect. However, they are also not a blocker for "Tool labs" product moves. So yes, please let's not be stuck until the final reorganisation happens. > > (In reply to comment #10) > > "Tool Labs" would not be a component, the individual tools > > (or groups of tools e.g. "magnustools") would. "Tool Labs" as a whole has > > its > > components under "Wikimedia Labs" product. > > Hmm. So as per comment 3 and comment 10 you propose > Wikimedia Labs > $tool on Tool Labs > instead of current > Tool Labs tools > $tool on Tool Labs > ? I'm undecided. I'm not sure what you mean here. :( If you mean moving "Tool Labs tools" components to "Wikimedia Labs" as they are, and add new components there for each future tool, no, it's not what I proposed but it's also an option. My proposal was to place components relating to Tool Labs as infrastructure under Wikimedia Labs product, and to place components about individual tools (i.e. the things which would be listed in [[mw:Toolserver/List_of_Tools]]; of course not each of them with an individual component) under the "Tools" product, effectively merging "Tool Labs tools" to "Tools" product, minus the bugs which shouldn't be there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
