https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=798
--- Comment #43 from Matthew Flaschen <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #42) > As suggested by WMF, I tried to start a discussion about this on Wikitech-I > but > not much came out of it. So the answer seems to be: nobody cares. Sorry to hijack this bug, but I'll just post once then hopefully it can move back to RFC and/or Wikitech. I think some feedback from Wikitech (e.g. Flow and issues with certain languages) was helpful, but I agree the Wikitech thread basically finished. For smaller stuff, the answer is Just Do It, and hash anything out in code review. For bigger architectural things (what to store in the database [e.g. MathML not TeX]), or having a single way of validating TeX/ANTLR grammar) where you want an answer before coding, it's probably time for an RFC (https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment). We talked about if/when to do this before, but now is probably a good time. Pick a single issue, unless of course one decision clearly implies others, in which case you should include the related ones. Above are just examples based on past discussions; the RFC can be whatever you think is appropriate. An example past implemented RFC (though probably a bit simpler) is https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Requests_for_comment/Reduce_math_rendering_preferences -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
