https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54604

--- Comment #13 from Bartosz DziewoƄski <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> That aside use of a single class .link-https rather than a
> combination of class .link-https, div#content a.external[href
> ^="https://";] would be preferable for a variety of reasons
> readability, maintainability, reduced file size... are you really
> telling me this is not a no-brainer?

Using the classes as you proposed does seem sane and mostly non-troublesome
(apart from the classic caching issues). I am perfectly fine with doing that
(as long as I'm not the one who will have to jerry-rig the Parser).

Killing the icons as suggested in comment 1 is a completely different thing
and, apart from what I mentioned in comment 7, I will vehemently oppose doing
it.


(In reply to comment #11)
> If you really feel the need for a citation check out:
> http://stevesouders.com/efws/css-selectors/csscreate.php

Either I am unable to figure it out, or it doesn't work. Reflow time is 0 for
me no matter what I do. "page load time" is measuring the speed of my
connection if anything.

(In reply to comment #12)
> CSS rule efficiency table:
> http://csswizardry.com/2011/09/writing-efficient-css-selectors/

This looks interesting; sorry, I don't have time to dig into it right now, but
hopefully I will later. (Hopefully it's still relevant - it was apparently
written in 2011, and two years is like a few decades at least ;) )

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to