https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55529
--- Comment #4 from Dario Taraborelli <[email protected]> --- We do have a concept of a "content namespace" that varies across wikis. http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Analytics/Metric_definitions#Content_namespaces My opinion is that both "countable pages" and "content namespaces" are MediaWiki artifacts that we cannot and shouldn't include in our KPI definitions going forward. 1) They make historical analysis pointless (as individual communities can change these definitions over time) 2) They make cross-project comparisons pointless (different projects use different definitions of "countable" and "content") 3) They make feature-level -> project-level projections impossible I recommend that: • we start using a stricter definition of active limited to ns0 and including all pages, not just countable ones. • we discuss on an ad-hoc basis how to accommodate special projects like Commons or Wikidata • we re-evaluate the pros and cons of this approach after a few months -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
