https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12363
--- Comment #21 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #20) > > Oliver says NewPagesFeed already lists page moves. If this is the case, then > we > should be evangelizing use of that tool as a short term solution. Verified that Special:newpagesfeed does not have this bug. Like special:newpages, special:newpagesfeed lists moved pages under their original creation date. This makes logical sense, however when I was testing examples on wikipedia, I noticed that lots of these pages were created long ago (often several months), thus in a sense these "new pages" appear at the bottom of the list, when they do appear, and hence perhaps still avoiding some scrutiny. > > The above solution is only good for enwiki though. If it's inordinately > difficult to add recent moves to Special:NewPages, then I think Option 2, and > creation of a proper Special:RecentMoves, would be the ideal case for most > Wikimedia wikis. > > Ideally, a Special:RecentMoves would... > > * Be able to be filtered by moves within any namespace > * Be able to be filtered down to cross-namespace moves > > Brian, I added Dan Garry to this bug, as it seems like it's a part of > Platform's remit. Dan, does that sound reasonable? Hmm, I wonder what the performance implications of Select * from recentchanges inner join page on page_id = rc_cur_id where rc_new = 1 and rc_namespace != page_namespace and page_namespace = 0; Seems like that would be a bit more scary then what normally can go on 'pedia. Then again, that's probably similar to the performance of Special:Recentchangeslinked, so maybe... [Saying this without doing any testing whatsoever, probably totally wrong]. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
