https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #10 from Quim Gil <[email protected]> --- Author, committer and reviewer are clear terms. "Merger" is confusing. As far as I know it's not a term used to describe a person, even less contributors whose patch has been merged. If anything, it sounds as contributors with +2 permissions in Gerrit that merge code from others. But we really need to clean this terminology: http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/scr.html mentions "top openers" (what is this?) and "top mergers". Clicking a contributor e.g. http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/people.html?id=278&name=Leslie%20Carr mentions you see "commits" and "closed reviews", and none of the values match. I would start by renaming "mergers" by "authors of merged code". We don't need to force one word only if that word doesn't exist. It is more important to have self-explanatory labels in metrics. Alvaro, how do you think you are doing with this KPI? As of today none of the questions of Comment #0 is answered yet. Do you think this will be ready by the ECT Showcase meeting next week? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
