https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51260
Michael M. <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #15 from Michael M. <[email protected]> --- Multiple columns for references causes two major usability issues: 1. When there is only one reference and this reference is longer than the column width, it is split into several parts, causing gaps inside the reference. This gets even worse for bidi texts: If you have a reference in a right-to-left language inside a left-to-right context, and it is split into multiple columns, you have to start reading on the right end of the left column, read to the left, jump right to the next column, read to the left again, etc. 2. When the list of references is longer than the screen and a reference breaks into two columns, you have to scroll to read it. This means: a) You click the superscript number, the browser sends you to the upper part of the reference. b) You have to scroll down to the beginning of the reference and start reading. c) You have to scroll up again to the second part and continue reading. d) If you don't know that you can use your browser's "back" function, you have to scroll down again to get to the back link. Both issues could be solved by using "break-inside: avoid-column;", but the browser support currently is very poor. So unless browser support for this improves in future or somebody writes a JS solution for it, multi-column reference lists are a bad idea for usability reasons. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
