https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52688
--- Comment #8 from Nemo <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #7) > My suggestion would be to continue pursuing the footer changes and see if > that > makes any difference (pending WMF Legal's input). That's reported as bug 53942; but it's not clear how it would be related to this problem. In general: is it really strange for a new website, whose content is mostly identical to the content of another website almost a decade older, to have a lower pagerank? Seems rather standard, until the new website gains enough incoming links to make the other one to be considered the clone. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
