https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Kinzler <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #3) > I understood that 302 was the fallback for non-HTTP 1.1 compatible clients > that won't understand 303; how is it semantically wrong for them? We are currently sending a 302 followed by a 303. A client that doesn't understand 303 would already be unable to that. In any case, this is for the http://www.wikidata.org/entity/ entry point - that's a URI schema explicitly designed for integration into the linked data web and geared towards clients that follow the respective rules and conventions. While it's important to support legacy clients for reading HTML pages, I really don't see the point for a linked data URI interface. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
