https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51895
MZMcBride <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #9 from MZMcBride <[email protected]> --- I'm tempted to re-open this bug for further consideration. (In reply to comment #0) > The list of users who edited the page shown in enhanced recent changes and > watchlist is rather unnecessary. > > * It can get unwieldy long for active discussion pages; 50 edits by 30 > different users a day is not an uncommon occurence Since we're already using JavaScript, can't we implement some kind of sane threshold? Here's an example entry from my English Wikipedia watchlist: --- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (57 changes | history) . . (+28,325) . . [Future Perfect at Sunrise; Ymblanter; Kudzu1; EatsShootsAndLeaves; Black Kite; 50.128.155.168; AndyTheGrump; Bbb23; Michig; John Reaves; Ronz; Silvio1973; Thryduulf; Peter James; Dbrodbeck (2×); 69.23.116.182 (2×); NE Ent (2×); Balloftwine (2×); Dr. Blofeld (2×); Konveyor Belt (2×); Drmies (2×); Joefromrandb (2×); Dougweller (3×); BullRangifer (3×); Redverton (3×); The Anome (4×); SchroCat (4×); Toddst1 (5×); Oakshade (5×)] --- Perhaps we could do a "roll up" here and collapse this into "[Future Perfect at Sunrise; Ymblanter; and 15 others]" where "15 others" is a link to expand to see the full list? I guess the "15 others" link could either just activate the toggle arrow to show all of the recent changes or it could print the same long list of usernames. Either approach would work for me, but perhaps this would still be too disruptive to users' workflows? Comment 4 is discouraging, while comment 6 was insightful and gave me hope. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
