https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57084
--- Comment #1 from Matthew Flaschen <[email protected]> --- It is counter-intuitive. I'm not sure if we should break backwards compatibility. I would normally want to keep it. However, the page ID is 0 when suppressing the redirect, which means there's no consistent way to get even the source page ID (though you can get the source on regular moves, and people may be relying on this). An option that should not break backwards compatibility is to add the old page ID in log_params (and somehow expose this to the move-specific sub-object in logevents). See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/api.php?action=query&list=logevents&lelimit=200&letype=move&format=jsonfm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
