https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37463
Quim Gil <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|Normal |High Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|[email protected]. |[email protected] |org | Summary|Gerrit statistics |Key performance indicator: | |Gerrit review queue --- Comment #8 from Quim Gil <[email protected]> --- Time to work on Gerrit review queue metrics. See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Community_metrics#Gerrit_review_queue These are the questions we want to answer in this iteration: How long is the Gerrit review queue over time? How long does it take to review code contributions? Are we improving? Are Wikimedia's staff and non-staff contributions processed equally? Who is doing better and worse? * Number of Wikimedia staff / non-Wikimedia-staff commits reviewed in <2 days, <1 week, <1 month, <3 months, >3 months or unreviewed (values may be fine tuned based on actual data). * Same as above, per project. Ranked from slowest to fastest. How to calculate the average time? A few old open changes might distort the picture. What if we compare the pure average of the 100% of commits with the average removing the 10% of slowest and fastest? One chart with extra data in a table? What kind of chart? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
