https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #41 from Michael Zajac <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #37) I don’t completely agree with Eduard Brown. WikiMedia hosts an unusual multilingual range of websites on unusual multilingual software. Text in some languages appears broken on many computers. There is nothing wrong with aspiring to fix the breakage when the technology is available. > Common sense dictates that users have fonts installed for their native > languages. An ideal. The reality is that millions of people cannot install fonts on the devices they depend on, for many different reasons. Smartphone users? Refugee immigrants relying on library computers configured in a language they barely know? They deserve access to information. > Autonym (which will by definition never be as good as a native font like > Arial on Windows) I don’t understand the logic of this. Arial is hardly a great typeface anyway. > I'm afraid there is definitely room for improvement right now! True. I don’t know why this was pushed out without some basic testing on common platforms. Most modern browsers on modern OSes render most language scripts these days. A simple fix for much of this would be to embrace installed fonts, and push Autonym to the bottom of a font stack that includes the default sans-serif fonts on the various platforms. I wonder if, indeed, “font-family: sans-serif, autonym;” would work to make this font the fallback’s fallback. Ideally, it should only be rendering text that would show up as tofu. Ideally. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
