https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41441
--- Comment #18 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) <[email protected]> --- Wikidata does not (at least in its current form, which I believe is by design) work well for metadata that is functionally determined by the main data (the actual page in question). As it stands, ?action=info is the only unified place we currently have for displaying functionally dependent metadata, so it would make sense to display that information there, should the feature request be implemented. Wikidata could come into this if wiktionary abandoned the whole raw page approach, and used wikidata for recording their content exclusively (kind of like OmegaWiki). In that case this type of information would be a query on wikidata type data, which would make it in scope of wikidata. I feel like that's probably not going to happen. The other scenario where I could see Wikidata coming into this, is if they expanded from their Wikidata -> client wikis, model, and made the data flow go both ways (to include automatically extracting properties from client wikis). That would add a lot of complications to everything, and expand wikidata's scope significantly. I have not heard anyone say they have plans to do anything like that, but I'm not quite up on latest goings-on in the Wikidata dev community (I'm sure someone can correct me if I'm wrong) (Intentionally avoiding commenting on the core content of comment 16 as I don't want to be drawn into any dispute that may be happening) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
