https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57091
--- Comment #11 from Niklas Laxström <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #10) > So if I understand correctly you now annotate these phantom languages with a > class? I haven't taken a closer look at the code yet and am not 100% clear The languages have class, non-languages don't. > languages need to be used in this way (wouldn't a hook allowing you add HTML > before or after the list be better?) The code generating the html for the list is duplicated at least in three places and it wouldn't easily allow forcing the section to show up. > but this still seems a little hacky to me Yes it is. The whole related code is filled with comments saying "hack". We were looking for a solution of least effort here, instead of big rewrites. > and semantically incorrect.. a list of languages should only contain > languages > surely? Only if someone declares it as a list of languages. I'd rather see it as a way to access different language versions without specifying the functionality ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
