https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57315

--- Comment #35 from Equazcion <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> I'm okay with delaying some of the questions I brought up for the future,
> but I
> do think the requirements are necessary.
> 
> To be fair Ori, namespaces I think you've added are things like Schema. These
> were not requested by the community, and we had complete control over what we
> thought was minimally necessary. They also didn't have the kind of
> far-reaching
> impact that a Draft namespace on our largest project does. I'm not saying we
> need to wait months or something, but I am saying we should make sure the
> absolute basics are agreed on and tested.

Yes, we could wait for Steve to completely squirm out of his original position
with corporate speak in order to preserve his pride, but I think it would be
more time-efficient to simply move ahead now. I'm just saying this for the
record. If anyone has some non-vague reason to say any of this is still
necessary let's hear it clearly and specifically.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to