https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57812
--- Comment #9 from Andrea Zanni <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > Am I understanding right that someone would highlight something like: > > > > > > "John Smith was born on February 3rd, 1952" on a web site, then natural > > > language processing would be used to suggest Wikidata statements (e.g. > > > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P569)? If so, it doesn't seem like > > > the > > > original quote/annotation needs to be stored, though the web site should > > > be > > > cited as a source. > > > > Yes, Matthew, that is what I have in mind. You take > > statements/citations/quotes > > from books and texts and you make them Wikidata statements: 2 Wikidata > > items, a > > Proeprty and a source. > > Hmm this again sounds to me like this is supposed to be saved in Wikidata. > This > is something I want to see a well thought out plan for with examples. Sorry, Lydia, my English is very bad and it's difficult for me to use the proper terms. Yes, that is supposed to be saved in Wikidata. Is it a problem? The idea is simple: I read a statement on a text, like, "Jorge Luis Borges was born in Buenos Aires". I have a tool for highlight it, and the tool parse the sentence, process natural language and suggests me 2 WD item (Borges and Buenos Aires) and a WD property (place of birth). I also have a source, which is the webpage I read the sentence from. This statement now should go in WD: the tool would login in WD and post it with my account. Is it more clear now? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
