https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53259

[email protected] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #3 from [email protected] ---
Google is already supporting Forward Secrecy for SSL connections.

The deployment of Forward Secrecy muss be done carefully, especialy when SSL
session IDs are used. But SSL session IDs can help reduce the overhead of
Forward Secrecy:

https://www.imperialviolet.org/2013/06/27/botchingpfs.html
http://blog.ivanristic.com/2013/06/ssl-labs-deploying-forward-secrecy.html
http://blog.ivanristic.com/2013/08/configuring-apache-nginx-and-openssl-for-forward-secrecy.html
http://blog.ivanristic.com/2013/08/increasing-dhe-strength-on-apache.html

There have been some questions about backdoors in ECDHE ciphers:

https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/10263/should-we-trust-the-nist-recommended-ecc-parameters

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to