https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41193
--- Comment #12 from [email protected] --- (In reply to comment #11) > Wikifram: Sorry, I won't read through the entire > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback#Rich_content. > 3F - > summarize clear testcases in Bugzilla in separate followup tickets to keep > things constructive, change your passive-aggressive tone, keep this ticket > closed as FIXED (as functionality exists but obviously is extremely > error-prone > for your testcases), and discuss high-level stuff refering to general testing > on the mailing list instead. Thanks. My tone isn't passive-agressive, it is simply agressive, as in thoroughly fed up with the way the WMF handles things. I love it though that theDJ has added a ticket that blocks this one, but that you closed it again nevertheless. I am not interested in discussing things on the mailing list, I am discussing it at enwiki which has the largest and least biased audience of all public discussion places (compared to MediaWiki, which has a rather more slanted and smaller audience, Foundation, where there are no public discussion spaces, and Bugzilla, which is not suited for this). Closing tickets without any explanation, like Product Manager Forrester did, is passive-agressive and completely unconstructive though. Perhaps you can lecture him on these things instead. My posts have been constructive, trying to improve Wikipedia and VE, but the format and tone hasn't been to your liking. Tough luck. If you wan to know what is wrong with this "feature", either read the enwiki thread or (better still) test it or get your team to test it thoroughly, but don't expect me to repeatedly seek the shabby treatment the WMF people routinely handle out to critics, by submitting new bugs about this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
