https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52005
Krinkle <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED CC| |[email protected] Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #17 from Krinkle <[email protected]> --- I've heard a fair amount of noise on the wikis from users not appreciating the usefulness of this. I'll try to summarise the concerns and suggestions below. I've translated some of them to different angles as I believe the response was exaggerated due to the visual footprint (a legend on itself should be useful, and should remain I believe). I don't dispute its usefulness, but I understand the concerns. The main issue here is that this new legend is too large and quite "in your face" and way too prominent on the top of a page active editors use very frequently. I don't think such a big box is justified. Encouraging CSS modifications as a first response is imho not an acceptable solution for this, but can work as a temporary work-around for tech-savvy users. It adds clutter to an already over-populated system and can make it just that extra bit of overwhelming that I think this is a user experience regression. It looks like design input was requested on this issue, did this change end up getting design input? As a first aid, I would recommend moving it to the bottom of the page (similar to how recent changes used to have, where did that one go by the way?). Also note that most of these icons have tooltips that do provide some information (though that's not a great UX either). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
