Nemo <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
           Keywords|                            |analytics
                 CC|                            |

--- Comment #11 from Nemo <> ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Change 102817 had a related patch set uploaded by Ori.livneh:
> Add user-agent header to the format spec of EventLogging's varnishncsa
> instance

Is there a list of said callers doing "user-agent logging and processing"
somewhere, for curiosity, to track the progress on their standardisation (which
is a very good thing to do) and to help define requirements?

(In reply to comment #10)
> Yes, sub-sampling would definitely be sufficient to get a representative
> sample.

In what cases is sub-sampling not sufficient? Can EventLogging default to
sampling for UA unless otherwise requested by callers? Or maybe the bucketing
mentioned above has the same results, is the implementation mentioned in
comment 4 described somewhere and/or the place where logs go documented (the
latter was asked by MZMcBride in )?

Just for fun (everybody here knows already), gives my main
browser's UA an entropy of 13.25, making it the most tracking item of all; in
the secondary browser (Chromium) it's 14.42 and the third worst after
accept-language and plugins.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Wikibugs-l mailing list

Reply via email to