https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57084

--- Comment #6 from Matthew Flaschen <mflasc...@wikimedia.org> ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I mistakenly wrote the comment above thinking that I was commenting on bug
> #26122.  Yet, I feel like the argument still applies here, though to a lesser
> extent due to potential backwards compatibility issues.

I agree.  EventLogging is a useful tool for the WMF, but it is not a substitute
for MediaWiki's built-in logging.

Built-in logging is important for third-party MW installs, on-wiki users
(though obviously not everything is visible to all users), and the
pages-logging.xml.gz dumps (though of course, what to dump requires
consideration).

Backwards compatibility is important, but it's not the only thing.  Sometimes
we have to break it to move forward.

As noted, I think it can be solved for built-in logging either way (with or
without backwards compatibility); they have different advantages.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to