--- Comment #6 from Kunal Mehta (Legoktm) <legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Lego with all due respect please don't reopen bugs. A closed bug doesn't
> necessarily mean the bug will be forgotten and doesn't prevent you from
> providing further arguments on why it should not be closed / writing patches
> and getting it reopened but from my perspective as a core developer of
> MobileFrontend it does come as a nuisance for knowing which bugs need working
> on and which don't.
The bug was closed as "WORKSFORME". According to [[mw:Bug management/Bug report
life cycle]], that means "when the problem can not be reproduced or when
missing information has not been provided". That is clearly not the case here,
which is why I re-opened it.
You can adjust the priority field then, I deliberately left it as
"Unprioritized" to allow people who do the most work in this component to
prioritize it according to what they plan on doing.
> Also, I'm not sure if intended but your tone in the latest bug report comes
> across as aggressive.
It wasn't, my apologies if it did come across that way. I was trying to make
the point that the line of argumentation being used is misguided and incorrect.
> I'd suggest raising a discussion on the design list for wider discussion as a
> better first step.
Thanks, that sounds like a good idea. I'll send an email in a few minutes.
It would be helpful if you could explain why you included a link to the draft,
I'm pretty well aware of it.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Wikibugs-l mailing list