https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29968
Nemo <federicol...@tiscali.it> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |http://gmpg.org/xfn/11
Summary|Enable XFN rel=me for links |Enable XFN rel=me for links
|on User Profile pages and |on user page and
|rel="author" links on topic |rel="author" links on
|articles |content pages
--- Comment #16 from Nemo <federicol...@tiscali.it> ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Is this still a good idea ? It seems that Google was advocating for this, but
> now itself has gone with something much simpler: See
> https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/1229920
Does any of the new methods apply here? I see no way the users could get
@en.wikipedia.org email addresses and ?rel=author links from the page itself.
It seems much cleaner and realistic to
1) use rel=author from the history (and from the footer for $wgMaxCredits > 0);
2) link the history from each page with rel=author and let indexers figure it
out (cf. comment 4): <link rel="author license" href="/about"> is an example
from an HTML 5 draft
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/document-metadata.html#rel ;
3) whitelist rel=me links from user pages in some way (or let some extension
figure this out).
Note that some are using ridiculously complex mixes of extensions to do this:
http://blog.säsongsmat.nu/2012/07/31/adding-authorship-information-to-mediawiki-pages/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
