--- Comment #4 from sj...@seznam.cz ---
Effectiveness, complicatedness and uselessness are relatively objective
characteristics, especially when the problems are described (in detail and even
twice). The fact that any step (as well as set of such steps) requiered
manytimes more clicks than would be necessary is not very subjective. IMHO also
the fact that at the item page, aliases cannot be edited at the same place
where labels and descriptions can, is objective, etc. Even when you would have
opposite needs, preferrences or oppinions, you should be able and ready to
understand objective problems of the software.
However, when the developers tend to ignore all problems and to negate and
refute all feedback instead to search, detect, reflect and solve them, the
outputs correspond to such attitude. To label such bugs as "invalid" is a bit
unambitious and unconstructive, at least.
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Wikibugs-l mailing list