https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59245
--- Comment #4 from Kunal Mehta (Legoktm) <legoktm.wikipe...@gmail.com> --- Personally, I think this feature should go in core, as a compliment to the sitenotice feature. Regardless, (In reply to comment #2) > Articles in draft namespace will look very different from "published" > articles > there will be no confusion by readers that they are reading a normal article > while reading a draft. I would go so far as to say there may not even be a > concept of "reading" a draft, e.g. Drafts are always in an editing mode > (just a > thought not a design decision) Has this been discussed onwiki anywhere? I had read https://blog.wikimedia.org/2013/12/20/new-draft-feature/ but what you're talking about wasn't even covered. > Basically this bug proposes both a problem and a solution to an issue that > doesn't exist yet. Let's not get ahead of ourselves. Why do you think the problem doesn't exist now? The Draft namespace is already live on enwiki and being used. > Closing this. If once the new draft workflow exists this is an issues for > readers then we can work on a solution together. This bug is not INVALID, please don't close it as such, I'm assuming you wanted WONTFIX. I recommend you review [[mw:Bug management/Bug report life cycle]], it's pretty helpful. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
