https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17645

--- Comment #23 from Nemo <federicol...@tiscali.it> ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> They are allowed to refuse patches if they think the patches have downsides,
> yes, but not to arbitrarily declare that all such patches must have that
> downside. [...]
> 
> And, in fact, there are multiple ways of getting around the issues he stated.
> There's no inherent reason that progressive JPEGs take longer to render than
> baseline JPEGs. It isn't the case on any modern software.

Have you brought this up with ImageMagick, then? You could also submit a patch
to them, as you mention that.
(Note, there's also VIPS but I don't think we ever use it for JPEG.
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2013/09/12/vipsscaler-implementation-wikimedia-sites/
)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to