https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53485
--- Comment #59 from Alvaro <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #55) > In a second look I have realized that the graphs at > http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/scr-countries.html count reviews. I think it > would make more sense that they would count authors. > > I mean, when it comes to organizations it does make sense to see which > organization is funding how much work, and it is good to count that work in > reviews. However, our interest in the location of contributors is based on > the > people, less on the amount of reviews. > > In the case of our community it is clear that most reviews come from USA and > Germany (when the devs fills their data) because this is where most WMF and > WMDE (professional, full time) developers are located. Still, if there are a > dozen of developers with just a bunch of commits in some other country we > definitely want to know. In this case, 10 developers with 5 merged commits > each > has more relevance than a single developer with 50 commits. > > Conclusion: it would be good to have the data based on authors. If you want > to > keep the current graphs that is fine too. > > When it comes to http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/who_contributes_code.html , > we will swap "Submitted per country (aggregated)" for the graph by people as > soon as it is available. But this is not a blocker for the KPI anymore, as > agreed. Ok Quim, I will take a look and try to use authors also in this report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
