Web browser: ---
            Bug ID: 60074
           Summary: stats should also consider discussion
           Product: Analytics
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Unprioritized
         Component: Tech community metrics
    Classification: Unclassified
   Mobile Platform: ---

As discussed on analytics list, the thing behind will be useful in general if it
manages to apply the standard definitions for content namespaces etc. 

However, for specifically, what we really lack in is a measure of discussion activity, specifically namespace
1. will be successful if it hosts vibrant discussion involving
all the relevant stakeholders of MediaWiki development, but the current graphs
is useless in monitoring that.

For instance:
* top editor for last month is MegaAlex, who did a lot of work on translations
for [[mw:GCI]], but he made more than 1971 edits (and Vldandrew made much more
than 132): probably help pages are not being counted here;
* the bug 59815 fiasco was successful in attracting a lot of discussion from
new people on the wiki:
but this won't show anywhere in the graph, while it would be very evident in a
ZeitGeist which happened to include n1.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Wikibugs-l mailing list

Reply via email to