https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60124

Chad H. <innocentkil...@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |tracking
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |innocentkil...@gmail.com
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #6 from Chad H. <innocentkil...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> All issue trackers are terrible. It would be a much better use of time to
> focus
> on discrete action items that could improve Bugzilla rather than seeking to
> simply replace it, in my opinion.

This.

This bug isn't actionable (neither is that RfC, really). Marking this INVALID.

I agree with everything said above: let's focus on incremental things we can
fix rather than starting over.

(In reply to comment #3)
> What makes them terrible? Do you think, given the information and ideas we
> currently have, that it would be possible to create one that isn't terrible?

I think part of it is because you've got a lot of different users wanting a lot
of different information out of a bug tracker. It's hard to do that without
overloading the user with information.

I'd also be firmly against us trying to embark on writing this ourselves. Bug
trackers--like time trackers--are universally bad. Ours will be awful too and I
have no desire to add another awful bug tracker to the dustbin of history.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to