https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56292

--- Comment #10 from Nemo <federicol...@tiscali.it> ---
So, as far as we know and until corrected the plan still is, per Erik Moeller,
bug 56433 comment 22:
> OK, then I'd like to request that the language engineering team implement
> that
> approach for now, unless there are issues we're overlooking. As noted, we can
> attach EventLogging to font activation, and we could potentially also run
> notices or calls-to-action in specific affected wikis. We can figure out in
> the
> next couple weeks if we want to prioritize getting back into a default-on
> state
> for automatic font delivery for some users/languages quickly, or if this
> should
> take a backseat to the language team's other priorities.
> 
> But, considering the significant payload added by automatic font delivery, I
> think that's a reasonable compromise for now. I appreciate the team's efforts
> to improve ULS performance across the board.

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/108024/ was already merged and is supposed
to serve webfonts only when strictly necessary. So, once the way forward is
detected, we need another report for what's needed to complete the plan.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to