--- Comment #27 from Yusuke Matsubara <> ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Change 108329 had a related patch set uploaded by Whym:
> (bug 53132) properly get timestamp position in DiscussionParser

Just to put this patch in context: unless this patch is applied, the parser
takes timestamp substrings instead of timestamp positions.  Languages that put
the year at the beginning of the timestamp, substrings as "2013" or "2014" were
interpret as the "position".  This made some vadility checks fail in the code.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Wikibugs-l mailing list

Reply via email to