--- Comment #10 from Jarry1250 <> ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > Unintended consequence: passing a blank assert= parameter to the API now
> > causes
> > an unknown_assert error, whereas before it was silently ignored. Bug or
> > feature?
> I don't consider this to be a bug since you shouldn't be passing blank
> parameters like that so I guess it can be considered a "feature".

Fair enough. Can we have a "blank_assert" (or somesuch) rather than
"unknown_assert" then? This is a breaking change to some reusers, so giving
them more debug information may be helpful.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Wikibugs-l mailing list

Reply via email to