--- Comment #9 from Chad H. <> ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I tried to clarify the bug summary.
> Why are we relying on the ldap/wmf group? Can't we simply be explicit (i.e.,
> <,members>)?

Because as far as I know, it's also used for access to some other services too
(I think the test logstash is an example, as it's still under development and
contains private logs). It's modeled after the ldap/ops group, which has
existed since labs launched.

It's used in gerrit mostly out of convenience, but I could be convinced
otherwise if we can't do this \/

> This would be much more transparent.

I would love to make the ldap groups (and everything about ldap) much much more
accessible on wikitech. There's not a whole lot of private data there.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Wikibugs-l mailing list

Reply via email to