https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52061
--- Comment #31 from C. Scott Ananian <canan...@wikimedia.org> --- I think I just saved this patch from a premature +2. I'd like to summarize what still needs to be done here: 1) In comment 29, Jesús Martínez Novo made a good suggestion to more widely publicize the new <lines> name before it gets committed. We almost inadvertently introduced a conflict with <verbatim>, I'd like some greater certainty that the new <lines> name proposal has been seen by a larger number of editors/extension authors. A mailing list thread might be a good way to kick off this discussion. 2) In the comments on the patch, '----' was brought up as the last remaining way that the current <lines> implementation differs from 'indent-pre' handling. I'd like to resolve this discrepancy: I really really *really* don't want to complicate the parser more with Yet Another Slightly Different Way to handle preformatted content. 3) I'd also like to review the code coverage issues a little more, to ensure that we're sharing code (and CSS rules) to the maximum extent possible. This is to ensure that point #2 continues to hold in the future, and we don't accidentally introduce subtle incompatibilities by changing only one side of a code path. Does anyone else have any remaining issues they'd like to see resolved before this is merged? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
