--- Comment #34 from This, that and the other <> ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> I'd like to resolve this discrepancy: I really really *really* don't want to
> complicate the parser more with Yet Another Slightly Different Way to handle
> preformatted content.

There's nothing really new here :) We're just sending a <pre> tag to the
parser, after all. The change to the parser itself is minuscule, and arguably
it is a fix for a long-standing bug that was never exposed until now.

(In reply to comment #33)
> (07:34:41 PM) subbu: so, we were wrong .. <poem> is not indent-pre with
> classes then.

I'm glad you're aware of this! As I said in Gerrit, the similarities are purely

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Wikibugs-l mailing list

Reply via email to