https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60412
Nemo <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #10 from Nemo <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #8) > Can't we simply be explicit (i.e., > <https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/admin/groups/11,members>)? With or without the current [[+2]] approval process that currently entails? (Both cases would require process changes...) (In reply to comment #9) > Because as far as I know, it's also used for access to some other services > too > (I think the test logstash is an example, as it's still under development and > contains private logs). It's modeled after the ldap/ops group, which has > existed since labs launched. I don't think there's any need to rethink this LDAP group from scratch. I think most if not all the people in the group who ever used +2 also had such permission via other groups (particularly for "their" extensions). It would be nice to have 1) a list of group members who ever used +2, 2) a list for the subset of (1) which could perform said +2 thanks to wmf group only. From that we can understand how big a change this would be. We might discover we only need a handful tweaks to some more specific groups' membership. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
