https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20186
--- Comment #21 from Tim Starling <[email protected]> 2010-02-07 00:35:30 UTC --- Sorted lists of revisions, such as history and contributions, are always ordered by timestamp. This avoids misordering in cases such as undeletion and Special:Import. Yes, there may be misordering of rev_timestamp due to clock skew, but it will only be seconds, not years, so people will usually not notice it. And edits to the same paragraph are always correctly ordered using rev_timestamp since the edit conflict mechanism implicitly protects it. Yes, Title::getNextRevisionID() uses rev_id, this is an unfortunate performance hack and will lead to inaccurate results due to import and undelete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
