--- Comment #35 from TeleComNasSprVen <> ---
(In reply to Chris McKenna from comment #32)
> I very strongly oppose the developers actioning this change until there is
> evidence of a much stronger community consensus than just 23 people two
> years ago (in a discussion that does not seem to have been massively
> advertised) and the non-objection of one person on one project. 
> Much stronger evidence of consensus has typically been required for less
> significant changes that affect only one project (the addition of a new
> namespace at en Wiktionary for example). 
> [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 February 16]] shows this
> conflicts with about 20 redirects (and at least 2 pages) on the English
> Wikipedia, and goodness knows how many on other projects (which appear not
> to have been consulted) so consensus does not seem to be guaranteed.

My thoughts exactly. It's why I reopened the RFC, 23 is not a suitable number
for such a large change.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Wikibugs-l mailing list

Reply via email to