https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37463
--- Comment #22 from Quim Gil <[email protected]> --- VERY COOL! These news graphs are very useful. Calculating "last code review" is not bad, and in fact it a useful measure per se. Jenkins reviews every new patchset within seconds, so at least we know that no patchset will be missed because of lack of reviews. Let's go with is, without removing the current graphs based on age of the first upload because they are also useful. This is good enough for now, and maybe all we need. Proposed steps: * in "Backlog of pending reviews", add the total amount of changesets submitted every month (optional, we can leave this for later) * the first graph at "Are Wikimedia's staff..." can be removed; it is a bit confusing and the second one explains better what we are looking for * in "Are Wikimedia's staff...", add "last code review median age at a given time" * in "Who is doing better and worse?", add a line for "last code review median age at a given time", without removing review_time_pending_days_acc_median, and sort repos by "last code review median age at a given time" * remember the fix to make all Y axis start with zero * also please have one graph per row (except for the list of repos, of course * and a small detail, currently the page as some horizontal scroll, and some graphs have no margin to the left, which I guess could be solved wrapping everything in a <div> width:95% or something. After this I believe your part will be ready, and then we can work on better descriptions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
