--- Comment #31 from Greg Grossmeier <> ---
(In reply to Bawolff (Brian Wolff) from comment #30)
> (In reply to Andre Klapper from comment #29)
> > Note: Dup bug 61898 comment 4 has some investigations by Sean.
> Could you change its component to not be security so we can see? (assuming
> nothing sensitive is there. This hardly seems like a security issue, but
> obviously its hard to make that judgement without knowing whats on the bug)

(Using Chatham House Rules ;) )

The reasoning for filing it under Security was given in bug 61898 comment 0:

"I'm filing this under Security to keep it on a low radar. They're innocent to
keep around, but in my experience filing these publicly may cause them to
disappear at some point when too many people spread the link without proper
context or try to poke at it."

No comment on the validity of the reasoning, but there are URLs in that bug
that are not on this one.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Wikibugs-l mailing list

Reply via email to