https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1584

--- Comment #12 from Nemo <federicol...@tiscali.it> ---
(In reply to Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason from comment #3)
> You can just use <ol> and <ul> syntax to achive the desired resaults.

I still don't see an answer to this very sensible concern. Isn't this extremely
generic bug asking, in practice, to reinvent the whole <ol> and <ul> syntax in
wikimarkup? Because that wouldn't make any sense.
We should instead identify specific pain points which make the output of the
syntax more sensible without making it more complex.
Some of the duplicates of this bug and of bug 1115 give such examples and
proposals.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to