--- Comment #10 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) <bawolff...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Eduard Braun from comment #8)
> My comparison and this bug is about PNG images. Since PNGs are lossless
> their quality and therefore their size can't be influenced (there are
> possibilities to optimize a PNG anyway but those normally don't make a huge
> Based on the different rendering the size of the resulting PNG thumnails
> differs also a little bit but nothing nothing notable I'd say and also
> nothing systematic (e.g. sometimes Imagemagick wins, sometimes VIPS).
> I think there's not much to gain at this end (in contrast to JPGs).
I think vips turns indexed pngs -> 8bits per channel pngs which can have a
massive affect on file size (but only affects a small number of files)
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Wikibugs-l mailing list