https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64708
--- Comment #11 from Quiddity <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jared Zimmerman (WMF) from comment #10) > Do we feel the disambiuation text will help people understand the context > any more? My intuition says no, Is it better for a reader to hover over a link, expecting something to happen, but getting nothing? If bug 63792 gets fixed (which is necessary for Wiktionary deployment and/or integration), and anything else necessary for getting "content after a ==heading== into the summary", then there shouldn't be very many "empty" hovercards left at all. Therefor, not getting a hovercard for disambig-links would be highly inconsistent. > eventually bring able to quickly fix > disambiuation links (when the should be fixed) sounds like a great > microcontribution but maybe out of scope for the current interation of > hovercards Yup, that's what I said in comment #5, "That's probably a feature for much later in time, but it's good to keep in mind." :) That's a good point, that not all disambig-links should be fixed. The CSS classes in some hatnotes /might/ be the best or only option, for detecting those. Otherwise, it would need a cautionary note in the microcontribution interface. </notesforlater> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
