https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63903
--- Comment #7 from C. Scott Ananian <[email protected]> --- @Tsui: explicit sizes are probably actually the right thing in most cases. There is some discussion in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Infobox_Image and it seems to me that the infoboxes with issues were ones that assumed a fixed width even though they didn't specify an explicit width bound, which was hostile to user customization. Remember: if you don't specify an explicit size, you are requesting that MW choose an "appropriate size", which could be anything -- and will likely vary on mobile, hi-density devices, user preference, etc. If that's not actually what you wanted, then yes you should be specifying size explicitly. That said, I am interested in continuing discussion on image options in general. There have been various RfCs proposing a more semantic set of image options, which would allow resizing in a more meaningful way than the current inflexible "default thumb size". Contact me on my talk page if you are interested in pursuing that discussion; offhand I can't remember if there is already a bugzilla and/or RfC for that work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
