https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66011
Nemo <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |[email protected] Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Nemo <[email protected]> --- Yes, there are some bugs, which will be solved. Cf. https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Thread:Talk:Search/LiquidThreads_archive/%27Old_search%27_is_better (In reply to SpontaneousGrumbler from comment #4) > Also, I have seen many cases {{vague}} > where some hiccup caused > CirrusSearch to miss an update; these apparently will never get fixed, It's enough to dummy edit the page (perhaps even null edit, I don't remember). > whereas the current updater for lsearchd will provide a completely updated > index whenever it runs to completion, even if that is not every day, as it > should be. Sounds like "whenever the gates of heaven open on earth, even if that is not every day, as it should be". AFAIK this has not happened in years. It's useless for us editors to pretend otherwise, this bug will not be fixed in this component (lsearchd). Please keep testing CirrusSearch, feedback and criticism are very useful to the devs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
