https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58196

--- Comment #46 from Eran Roz <[email protected]> ---
Hi Luis, thanks for the update.

(In reply to Krinkle from comment #40)
> 
> To avoid strange statistical variance like that, I'd recommend making
> timestamp of the currently running month appear as last month's. That way no
> data is excluded. This seems like a simple enough variance that tools should
> be able to work with without much hassle.

I think it is good solution. The timestamp is used mainly for filtering active
vs non-active users.


(In reply to Luis Villa (WMF Legal) from comment #42)
> (In reply to Tisza Gergő from comment #35)
> > Maybe instead of a live view, this table could be generated by a query which
> > runs at the end of the day; that way no information is leaked by the timing
> > of the change. Although that still does not solve the issue for small wikis
> > since we probably want to run it more often than once a month.
> 
> If we only provide one month granularity in the answer, then it can be run
> only once a month, right? Sounds like the use cases here don't need
> precise/fine-grained answers to this question?

*My use case: the user_properties_anonym table is used for
generating[[meta:Gadgets]] - statistics on the most popular gadgets accross
Wikimedia projects.
* (other example for use case) User preferences statistics are provided by
MZMcBride in [[en:Wikipedia:Database reports/User preferences]]
So I belive one month resolution is fine for statistics use cases, and running
it once a month could be enougth.
As Krinkle wrote above, month resolution (YYYY-MM) make it hard to associate it
to specific user.


However for very very small wikis I think it isn't possible to provide such
statistics: refering to
http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediansEditsGt5.htm (Wikipedias by
active users) some languages such as Tsonga or Oromo have only one active user.
I think there should be a threshold on the number of active users in a wiki.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to