https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66265
Bug ID: 66265
Summary: Code review time must be on merged patches, not closed
ones
Product: Analytics
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: Unprioritized
Component: Tech community metrics
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
CC: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Web browser: ---
Mobile Platform: ---
Created attachment 15584
--> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=15584&action=edit
Screenshot of the graph in question
I just noticed that under "Are Wikimedia's staff and non-staff contributions
processed equally?" the answer is "Review time for open submissions (median)".
That's not an answer to the question, because you measure neglected things
which are *not* processed.
Moreover, the neglected contributions by staff are often part of their
volunteer/pet projects coding rather than of their goals (can you imagine a
patch for a bug with a deadline rotting for 150 days?); so the hats of their
authors means little.
The solution is simple: reverse your query, calculate the median time that it
took for *merged* patches to be merged.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
