https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61577
--- Comment #2 from Bartosz Dziewoński <[email protected]> --- It seems to be that even a very rudimentary broken-by-design dependencies support in addModuleStyles() would be a better fix for bug 45229 than preserving the call order (or no fix at all). Situations like you describe in point 2) can be easily handled by duplicating the module under a new name until cached page HTML expires. This of course sucks a lot, but *we already do this all the time* to make incompatible changes in HTML. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
