https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50979
--- Comment #5 from Bawolff (Brian Wolff) <[email protected]> --- I mean im ok with increasing. Some limit is probably needed, i just doubt 1000 vs 2000 would make any appreciable difference. I would go as far as to suggest 5000 to be reasonable. Since cached special pages are paged via offset, a super really high limit would eventually introduce performance problems on the viewing cached results stage. But that's wiki agnostic anyways. No limits would probably also result in inserting a hundred thousand rows which would also be bad. (i should be 100% clear that this is just my personal opinion. I definitely *do not* have the authority to decree what is and is not acceptable performance wise for wikimedia. I also have not profiled different settings or otherwise tested) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
